On Saturday 01 October 2016 19:49:17 Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 9/30/2016 5:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> >> What's the drawback, if any? > >> > > >> > I don't see any drawback to be honest. > > > > I'd go for it then, if Bjorn doesn't hate it. > > I posted a follow up patch a minute ago. > > [PATCH 1/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce static IRQ array size to 16" > [PATCH 2/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts > [PATCH 3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" > > Can we have some testing coverage? and eventually have tested-by? Fixes the problem on all 4 machines. These patches also need to go into 4.7-stable and 4.8-stable. Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Ondrej Zary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
