On 2016-09-30 02:44, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Friday 30 September 2016, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 9/29/2016 2:00 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
>> The previous two patches were in the right direction.
>>
>> > Can we also get the same output from 4.6 kernel with the attached
>> > patch for the same machine you sent these?
>
> Here it is.
>
>> > Something about SCI still doesn't feel right.
>> >
>> > The IRQ assignment fails if the penalty is greater than
>> > PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS. This will happen if BIOS tells us to use an
>> > IRQ and same IRQ is in use by the SCI.
Thanks, I reverted penalize_sci function and dropped patch #1. Can you
try
this again?
It seems to work, at least on one machine.
Ok, that comfirms my suspicion. We are having trouble detecting sci
interrupt type and we end up penalizing the wrong value.
Can you try your other machines too?
I need to do some research now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
