Hi,
On 09/16/2016 08:33 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> writes:
Its possible that an ACPI system has multiple CPU types in it
with differing PMU counters. Iterate the CPU's and make a determination
about how many of each type exist in the system. Then take and create
a PMU platform device for each type, and assign it the interrupts parsed
from the MADT. Creating a platform device is necessary because the PMUs
are not described as devices in the DSDT table.
This code is loosely based on earlier work by Mark Salter.
(trimming)
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(pmu, safe_temp, &pmus, list) {
+ if (unused_madt_entries)
+ pmu->cpu_count = num_possible_cpus();
So if there is any unbooted cpu ...
+
+ res = kcalloc(pmu->cpu_count,
+ sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
... we allocate potentially large number (num_possible_cpus()) of
resources for each PMU.
This is needlessly wasteful. Under what conditions have you found
reg_midr to be 0?
Unused MADT entries, in place for potentially unbooted/hotplug CPUs. In
those cases you don't know for sure which PMU the CPU belongs to until
it comes online and the MIDR can be read. I'm open to suggestions on how
to deal with this, outside of pushing my luck and further breaking the
platform device encapsulation by trying to reallocate the resource
structure while its active. Besides its only wasteful for
ACPI+big.little, which at the moment only applies to a development platform.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html