On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 10:31 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 09:11:30PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
> > Thanks for the analysis. Looks like acpi_gbl_root_node == 0. It is
>
> Is ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge) == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT?
>
> Because this is what the code does but I can't see it from the code that the
> handle is of type ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT...
>
I seem to have the clue. It is because ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge) == NULL.
Then this root bridge doesn't have a corresponding ACPI device. In this case
we shouldn't call acpi_ioapic_add(). This can be true for some old platforms.
If that's the case then the patch below can fix it.
Thanks
Rui
>From b37d806c78e5eea70dbb890c1e3dbb8b7e5038e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:56:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] x86/ioapic: Ignore root bridges without a companion ACPI device
Some PCI root bridges don't have a corresponding ACPI device.
Don't call acpi_ioapic_add() on these bridges because they can't
support ioapic hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
index ec538d3..2b05ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -1852,10 +1852,15 @@ dump:
void __init pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void)
{
struct pci_bus *root_bus;
+ acpi_handle root_handle;
list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) {
pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus);
- acpi_ioapic_add(ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge));
+ root_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge);
+
+ /* make sure the root bridge has a companion ACPI device */
+ if (root_handle)
+ acpi_ioapic_add(root_handle);
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
