On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:37:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On ACPI ARM based systems the GIC interrupt controller > > and corresponding interrupt model permit only the high > > polarity for level interrupts. > > > > ACPI firmware describes PCI legacy IRQs through entries > > in the _PRT objects. Entries in the _PRT can be of two types: > > > > - Static: not configurable, trigger/polarity default to level-low, > > _PRT entry defines the global GSI interrupt number > > - Configurable: _PRT interrupt entry contains a reference to the > > corresponding PCI interrupt link device (that in turn provides the > > interrupt descriptor through its _CRS/_PRS methods) > > > > Configurable IRQ entries are not currently allowed by the ACPI > > specification on ARM, since they can only be used for interrupt > > pins that are routable, and ARM platforms GIC configurations > > do not allow dynamic IRQ routing, routing is statically laid out > > at synthesis time; therefore PCI interrupt links cannot be used > > for PCI legacy IRQ descriptions in the _PRT on ARM systems. > > > > On the other hand, current core ACPI code handling PCI legacy IRQs > > consider IRQ trigger/polarity for static _PRT entries as level-low. > > > > On ARM systems with a GIC interrupt controller and corresponding > > ACPI interrupt model this does not work in that GIC interrupt > > controller is only capable of handling level interrupts whose > > polarity is high (for PCI legacy IRQs - that are level-low by > > specification - this means that the legacy IRQs are inverted before > > reaching the interrupt controller pin), resulting in IRQ allocation > > failures such as: > > > > genirq: Setting trigger mode 8 for irq 18 failed (gic_set_type+0x0/0x48) > > > > Change the default polarity for PCI legacy IRQs to high on systems > > booting wth ACPI on platforms with a GIC interrupt controller model, > > fixing the discrepancy between specification and HW behaviour. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Duc Dang <dhdang@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 10 +++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > > index 2c45dd3..c576a6f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > > @@ -411,7 +411,15 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) > > int gsi; > > u8 pin; > > int triggering = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; > > - int polarity = ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW; > > + /* > > + * On ARM systems with the GIC interrupt model, level interrupts > > + * are always polarity high by specification; PCI legacy > > + * IRQs lines are inverted before reaching the interrupt > > + * controller and must therefore be considered active high > > + * as default. > > + */ > > + int polarity = acpi_irq_model == ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC ? > > + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH : ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW; > > char *link = NULL; > > char link_desc[16]; > > int rc; > > -- > > Bjorn, any objections? Looks OK to me. I never did figure out exactly what in the ACPI spec prohibited the use of interrupt links, so a spec reference there would be nice. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
