On 2016/9/5 22:57, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:19:43PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2016/8/15 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
The platform device kernel API does not provide functions to
retrieve a platform device through the corresponding struct
device fwnode pointer.
Implement the fwnode platform_device look-up in drivers core
code by using the bus_find_device() API and a corresponding
matching function. The OF equivalent (eg of_find_device_by_node())
will reuse the newly introduced function when OF code will
take care of setting up the device->fwnode value that is
currently left dangling for platform devices instantiated out
of device tree nodes.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/platform_device.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 6482d47..3ef150d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -760,6 +760,29 @@ err_out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__platform_create_bundle);
+static int fwnode_dev_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+ return dev->fwnode == data;
+}
+
+/**
+ * platform_find_device_by_fwnode() - Find the platform_device associated
+ * with a fwnode
+ * @fwnode: Pointer to firmware node
+ *
+ * Returns platform_device pointer, or NULL if not found
+ */
+struct platform_device *
+platform_find_device_by_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+{
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, fwnode,
+ fwnode_dev_match);
+ return dev ? to_platform_device(dev) : NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(platform_find_device_by_fwnode);
As SMMU is registered as platform devices, I think we need such
API to retrieve the platform device with fwnode handle, actually
Kefeng introduced a similar patch [1], but your patch is more
generic, so this patch make sense to me,
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks ! Strictly speaking, with Robin's new series:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-August/018230.html
(and corresponding v5 of this one that I have rebased on top of it) we
do not need this patch any longer and it is not really that generic
keeping in mind that it can't be used for DT matching (because in DT
dev->fwnode is dangling); I will see if I keep this patch according
to dependencies.
OK, I think I will wait for your new version, then try another test
and review it, does it make sense?
Side note: I have a problem with [1], since that code is there to
implement DT phandles in ACPI IIUC and we must really prevent that :)
Agreed :)
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
