On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:30:00 -0500 > Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> > [ +Bjorn, Punit] >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:13AM -0700, Duc Dang wrote: >> > > [Resend in plain text mode] >> > > >> > > Hi Lorenzo, Rafael, >> > > >> > > ACPI 6.1 spec does not specify how to set interrupt polarity and >> > > trigger mode in _PRT when the interrupts are static (hardwired to >> > > specific interrupt inputs in interrupt controller). In current >> > > acpi_pci_irq_enable (drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c) implementation, by >> > > default the trigger mode is set to LEVEL_SENSITIVE, polarity is set to >> > > ACTIVE_LOW. This default setting won't work for ARM64 GICv2, GICv2m, >> > > GICv3 controllers and will cause failures in PCIe AER, PME services >> > > (on X-Gene platforms). >> >> PCI (not PCIe) r3.0, sec 2.2.6, says "Interrupts on PCI are optional >> and defined as 'level sensitive,' asserted low." >> >> I've heard before that ARM64 does this differently, but I still don't >> understand the difference. Obviously if you plug a legacy PCI card >> into an ARM64 system, it's still going to pull INTA# low to assert an >> interrupt. So is there something special about ARM64 that inverts >> that, or what? > > There is certainly an inverter somewhere on the interrupt path, because > the GIC triggers on level high, not level low. But I don't think that's > the issue Duc is trying to outline here, because that's not something > SW can fix. I'm worried that in his system, the interrupt is edge > triggered instead. Yes, there is an inverter in the interrupt path to deliver interrupt to the GIC as level-high. X-Gene GIC uses level high for PCI INTx. I myself has been lucky when using trigger-rising for PCI INTx in DT boot mode. > >> >> > > Is there any way to specify polarity and trigger mode for static >> > > interrupts in _PRT? >> >> There is no way I'm aware of in _PRT to specify polarity and trigger >> mode. I don't know the history, but my guess is that it would be seen >> as superfluous given that the PCI spec requires level, active low. The device still pulls the INTx pin low to trigger interrupt, but the interrupt delivered to interrupt controller (GIC in this case) is not necessarily to be level-low. Current code assume level-low mode to program to the interrupt controller for INTx, and fails for GIC, GICv2m and GICv3. >> >> Obviously I'm missing something important. > > Same here, unless the HW is not PCI compliant... > > Thanks, > > M. > -- > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny. Regards, Duc Dang. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
