Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] serial: 8250_dw: Use new dev variable in probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 16:20 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2016/8/22 19:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 19:01 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > 
> > > Use new dev variable instead of pdev->dev and p->dev in probe
> > > function.
> > 
> > I'm not sure we need this one. What is wrong with &pdev->dev?
> 
> Yes, no error in current code. there are &pdev->dev(A) and p->dev(B),
> some codes use A, others use B, so I want to use an unified one.
> 
> If someone don't like this, I will drop it, :)

I want to say that this change doesn't belong to the series in this
case. You may submit it separately later on.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux