On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 12:54 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.c
> om> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/18/2016 3:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@int
> > > el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The nfit driver had an acpi event notification handler, but it
> > > > never
> > > > would've worked because we weren't setting the
> > > > ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS flag in acpi_driver.
> > >
> > > Let's update the changelog to be helpful for someone implementing
> > > a
> > > backport or taking this back to a -stable branch. Something like:
> > >
> > > Subject: acpi, nfit: fix event notifications
> > >
> > > Commit 209851649dc4 "acpi: nfit: Add support for hot-add" added
> > > support for _FIT notifications, but it neglected to set the
> > > ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS flag that acpi_bus_notify() uses to
> > > gate
> > > notification delivery.
> >
> > While we're at it, should we update the notifier function to
> > explicitly check
> > for event 0x80 before re-evaluating the _FIT? I'm thinking about
> > some time
> > in the future when there might be more than one event.
>
> Yes, good idea.
Sounds good, part of the same patch or separately?��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
