[Patch v2] x86, ACPI: Fix the wrong assignment when Handle apic/x2apic entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



By pure accident the bug makes no functional difference, because the only
expression where we are using these values is (!count && !x2count), in which
the variables are interchangeable, but it makes sense to fix the bug
nevertheless.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Ingo rewrote changelog]
---
v1-v2:
  -Just update change log.

 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 90d84c3..2b25d3f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1031,8 +1031,8 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries(void)
 			return ret;
 		}
 
-		x2count = madt_proc[0].count;
-		count = madt_proc[1].count;
+		count = madt_proc[0].count;
+		x2count = madt_proc[1].count;
 	}
 	if (!count && !x2count) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "No LAPIC entries present\n");
-- 
2.5.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux