I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/sbs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sbs.c b/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
index ad0b13a..e27ecbf 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sbs.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Smart Battery System ACPI interface driver");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static unsigned int cache_time = 1000;
-module_param(cache_time, uint, 0644);
+module_param(cache_time, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(cache_time, "cache time in milliseconds");
static bool sbs_manager_broken;
--
2.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
