On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:26 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Given that nvdimm_flush() has higher overhead than wmb_pmem() (pointer
> chasing through nd_region), and that we otherwise assume a platform has
> ADR capability when flush hints are not present, move nvdimm_flush() to
> REQ_FLUSH context.
>
> Note that we still arrange for nvdimm_flush() to be called even in the
> ADR case. We need at least once wmb() fence to push buffered writes in
> the cpu out to the ADR protected domain.
>
> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
-Toshi��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
