On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:27:23AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are many AML tables reporting wrong initial lid state, and some of > > them never reports lid state. As a proxy layer acting between, ACPI button > > driver is not able to handle all such cases, but need to re-define the > > usage model of the ACPI lid. That is: > > 1. It's initial state is not reliable; > > 2. There may not be open event; > > 3. Userspace should only take action against the close event which is > > reliable, always sent after a real lid close. > > This patch adds a new input key event so that new userspace programs can > > use it to handle this usage model correctly. And in the meanwhile, no old > > programs will be broken by the userspace changes. > > > > Link: https://lkml.org/2016/3/7/460 Does not work for me. > > Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2087 Gives me info about pull "Basic DNSSEC support, and unrelated fixes" > > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Bastien Nocera: <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > drivers/acpi/button.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > > include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 2 +- > > include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h | 3 ++- > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c > > index 148f4e5..4ef94d2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c > > @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ static int acpi_lid_evaluate_state(struct acpi_device *device) > > return lid_state ? 1 : 0; > > } > > > > -static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state) > > +static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, > > + int state, bool notify_acpi) > > { > > struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device); > > int ret; > > @@ -138,6 +139,11 @@ static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state) > > /* input layer checks if event is redundant */ > > input_report_switch(button->input, SW_LID, !state); > > input_sync(button->input); > > + if (notify_acpi) { > > + input_report_switch(button->input, > > + SW_ACPI_LID, !state); > > + input_sync(button->input); > > If you use a switch, you'll never send subsequent open state if you > doesn't close it yourself. > See my comments in 5/5 and please use a KEY event instead. > > > + } > > > > if (state) > > pm_wakeup_event(&device->dev, 0); > > @@ -279,7 +285,8 @@ int acpi_lid_open(void) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_lid_open); > > > > -static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device) > > +static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device, > > + bool notify_acpi) > > { > > int state; > > > > @@ -287,17 +294,17 @@ static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device) > > if (state < 0) > > return state; > > > > - return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state); > > + return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state, notify_acpi); > > } > > > > static void acpi_lid_initialize_state(struct acpi_device *device) > > { > > switch (lid_init_state) { > > case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN: > > - (void)acpi_lid_notify_state(device, 1); > > + (void)acpi_lid_notify_state(device, 1, false); > > break; > > case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_METHOD: > > - (void)acpi_lid_update_state(device); > > + (void)acpi_lid_update_state(device, false); > > break; > > case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_IGNORE: > > default: > > @@ -317,7 +324,7 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) > > case ACPI_BUTTON_NOTIFY_STATUS: > > input = button->input; > > if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID) { > > - acpi_lid_update_state(device); > > + acpi_lid_update_state(device, true); > > } else { > > int keycode; > > > > @@ -436,6 +443,7 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device) > > > > case ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID: > > input_set_capability(input, EV_SW, SW_LID); > > + input_set_capability(input, EV_SW, SW_ACPI_LID); > > Can't we export this new event only if the _LID function is not > reliable? This could check for the module parameter lid_init_state and > only enable it for ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN. > > I really hope we will be able to find a reliable way to determine > whether or not the platform support reliable LID state. If not, there > might be a need to have a db of reliable switch platforms. This can be > set in the kernel or with a hwdb entry in userspace. > > Cheers, > Benjamin > > > break; > > } > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h > > index 6e4c645..1014968 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h > > @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ struct pcmcia_device_id { > > #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_LED_MAX 0x0f > > #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_SND_MAX 0x07 > > #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_FF_MAX 0x7f > > -#define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_SW_MAX 0x0f > > +#define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_SW_MAX 0x10 > > > > #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_BUS 1 > > #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_VENDOR 2 > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h > > index 737fa32..81c344c 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h > > @@ -780,7 +780,8 @@ > > #define SW_ROTATE_LOCK 0x0c /* set = rotate locked/disabled */ > > #define SW_LINEIN_INSERT 0x0d /* set = inserted */ > > #define SW_MUTE_DEVICE 0x0e /* set = device disabled */ > > -#define SW_MAX 0x0f > > +#define SW_ACPI_LID 0x0f /* set = lid shut */ 0x0f is busy already. > > +#define SW_MAX 0x10 > > #define SW_CNT (SW_MAX+1) > > > > /* > > -- > > 1.7.10 > > -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
