On 07/07/16 22:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:ACPI 6.0 introduced LPI(Low Power Idle) states that provides an alternate method to describe processor idle states. It extends the specification to allow the expression of idle states like C-states selectable by the OSPM when a processor goes idle, but may affect more than one processor, and may affect other system components. LPI extensions leverages the processor container device(again introduced in ACPI 6.0) allowing to express which parts of the system are affected by a given LPI state. It defines the local power states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM. Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform coordinated and OS initiated. This series aims at providing basic and initial support for platform coordinated LPI states. v7[7]->v8: - Replaced HAVE_GENERIC_CPUIDLE_ENTER with CPU_IDLE_ENTER_WRAPPED macro, which is more cleaner and definately less confusing :) (Thanks to Rafael for the suggestion)Patches [3-6/6] definitely look a lot cleaner to me now. :-) That said, the name of the macro I suggested was just an example, so if people don't like this one, it'd be fine to change it as far as I'm concerned.
I can think of addition to indicate it's pm notifiers wrapper. i.e. CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PM_NOTIFIERS_WRAPPED. Is it too long ? I am happy with the way it is too. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
