On 07/01/2016 03:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Al Stone <ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The static function acpi_parse_entries_array() is provided an array of >> type struct acpi_subtable_proc that has a callback function and a count. >> The count should reflect how many times the callback has been successfully >> called. However, the current code only increments the 0th element of the >> array, regardless of the number of entries in the array, or which callback >> has been invoked. The fix is to use the index into the array, instead of >> a pointer to the beginning of the array. > > OK, so it would be good to say what the consequences of the problem are too. > Hrm. So replace the last sentence with something like: The fix is to use the index into the array, instead of a pointer to the beginning of the array, so that the count for each element in the array in incremented by the corresponding callback. That feels a little clunky but is it closer to what you were thinking? Thanks for the review! -- ciao, al ----------------------------------- Al Stone Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
