Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 9:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Well, this is a rather obvious one, so I'm wondering why it is the
>> last one in the series?
>>
>
> The first three are more relevant to each other. It makes easy to
> correlate the changes.

But this one doesn't seem to depend on them and it could be applied
without them, right?

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux