On 2016-06-24 19:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Karl-Heinz Schneider wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree documentation for the sbs-manager
*snip*
>> +
>> +From OS view the device is basically an i2c-mux used to communicate with up to
>> +four smart battery devices at address 0xb. The driver actually implements this
>> +behaviour. So standard i2c-mux nodes can be used to register up to four slave
>> +batteries. Channels will be numerated as 1, 2, 4 and 8.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +batman@0a {
>> + compatible = "sbs,sbs-manager";
>> + reg = <0x0a>;
>> + sbsm,i2c-retry-count = <3>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + channel1@1 {
>
> channel@1
>
> Do we have a standard node name for mux nodes? If not, we should.
No name is enforced by the i2c mux support code, but I think "i2c"
dominates, and quite possibly it is the only documented name?
Cheers,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
