On Thursday, June 23, 2016 02:42:57 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 06:45:15 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > On 14/06/16 15:48, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > ACPI 6.0 introduced LPI(Low Power Idle) states that provides an alternate > > > method to describe processor idle states. It extends the specification > > > to allow the expression of idle states like C-states selectable by the > > > OSPM when a processor goes idle, but may affect more than one processor, > > > and may affect other system components. > > > > > > LPI extensions leverages the processor container device(again introduced > > > in ACPI 6.0) allowing to express which parts of the system are affected > > > by a given LPI state. It defines the local power states for each node > > > in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can use _LPI object to > > > select a local power state for each level of processor hierarchy in the > > > system. They used to produce a composite power state request that is > > > presented to the platform by the OSPM. > > > > > > Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy > > > node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is > > > required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform > > > coordinated and OS initiated. > > > > > > This series aims at providing basic and initial support for platform > > > coordinated LPI states. > > > > > > > Gentle ping, was hoping to target this series for v4.8 > > On my list of things to take care of this week. But this is a long list ... Well, there are comments from Lorenzo and Daniel that need addressing, so can you please do that and resend? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
