On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 1:35 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:11:41PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, June 22, 2016 11:15 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > @@ -1779,8 +1780,12 @@ void __init
> > > > pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void)
> > > > {
> > > > struct pci_bus *root_bus;
> > > >
> > > > - list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node)
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) {
> > > > pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus);
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > > > + acpi_ioapic_add(ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge));
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > Doesn't this do the right thing even if you omit the #ifdefs, since
> > > you define a stub function below?
> > >
> >
> > No. Without the '#ifdef CONFIG_X86' it breaks MIPS arch. The stub
> > function is within 'ifdef CONFIG_ACPI'. On archs without ACPI it
> > doesn't compile due to 'undefined reference to acpi_ioapic_add'.
>
> But this *could* be made to work by defining a stub for the non-
> CONFIG_ACPI case. That's what we generally do to avoid ifdefs in the code.
That can be done. I'll make the change and do some cross-compiling tests first.
Thanks
Rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
