Hi Sinan,
On 13/06/2016 06:26, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Open call is ignoring the return code from reset call and can
> potentially continue even though reset call failed.
>
> If reset_required module parameter is set, this patch is going
> to validate the return code and will abort open if reset fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index d84c399..d3141e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_open(void *device_data)
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
>
> if (!vdev->refcnt) {
> + const char *extra_dbg = NULL;
> +
> ret = vfio_platform_regions_init(vdev);
> if (ret)
> goto err_reg;
> @@ -272,7 +274,12 @@ static int vfio_platform_open(void *device_data)
> if (ret)
> goto err_irq;
>
> - vfio_platform_call_reset(vdev, NULL);
> + ret = vfio_platform_call_reset(vdev, &extra_dbg);
> + if (ret && vdev->reset_required) {
> + dev_warn(vdev->device, "reset driver is required and reset call failed in open (%d) %s\n",
> + ret, extra_dbg ? extra_dbg : "");
> + goto err_rst;
> + }
> }
>
> vdev->refcnt++;
> @@ -280,6 +287,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_open(void *device_data)
> mutex_unlock(&driver_lock);
> return 0;
>
> +err_rst:
> + vfio_platform_irq_cleanup(vdev);
> err_irq:
> vfio_platform_regions_cleanup(vdev);
> err_reg:
>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
