On 10.06.2016 17:49, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:14:58PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Bjorn, Tomasz,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:15:59PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index eb431b5..2b52178 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
* Copyright 1997 -- 2000 Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>
*/
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -4941,7 +4942,7 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
-void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
+static int of_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
Can we do a little cleanup before this patch?
- pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() is only used inside drivers/pci, so
maybe we move the prototype to drivers/pci/pci.h?
- I don't really like the style of calling a function that
internally assigns bus->domain_nr. Could we do something like
this instead?
int pci_bus_domain_nr(...)
{
...
return domain;
}
... pci_create_root_bus(...)
{
...
b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
We noticed while preparing v9, that this would force us to
write an empty pci_bus_domain_nr() prototype for
!PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC (ie every arch but ARM/ARM64) that should
return 0 to keep current behaviour unchanged.
That's why pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() was there, so that it
was compiled out on !PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC.
I really would like v9 to be final so let's fix it before posting it
shortly please.
For the above we have three options:
1) Leave code as-is in v8
2) in pci_create_root_bus():
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
#endif
+ other changes requested above
3) in pci_create_root_bus()
b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
unguarded and a stub:
#ifndef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
static inline int pci_bus_domain_nr() { return 0; }
#endif
+ other changes requested above
Actually, Tomasz made me notice that pci_bus.domain_nr is
only declared for CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC so (3) is not
even an option and IMO (2) is not much nicer than code in
v8 as-is with an ifdef in the middle of pci_create_root_bus().
To me (1) is nicer too. Bjorn what is your take on this? This is last
bit before sending v9.
Thanks,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
