On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:21:19PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 08.06.2016 02:15, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:18PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> >>PCI core code provides a config option (CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC)
> >>that allows assigning the PCI bus domain number generically by
> >>relying on device tree bindings, and falling back to a simple counter
> >>when the respective DT properties (ie "linux,pci-domain") are not
> >>specified in the host bridge device tree node.
> >>
> >>In a similar way, when a system is booted through ACPI, architectures
> >>that are selecting CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC (ie ARM64) require kernel
> >>hooks to retrieve the domain number so that the PCI bus domain number
> >>set-up can be handled seamlessly with DT and ACPI in generic core code
> >>when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC is selected.
> >>
> >>Since currently it is not possible to retrieve a pointer to the PCI
> >>host bridge ACPI device backing the host bridge from core PCI code
> >>(which would allow retrieving the domain number in an arch agnostic
> >>way through the ACPI _SEG method), an arch specific ACPI hook has to
> >>be declared and implemented by all arches that rely on
> >>CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC to retrieve the domain number and set it
> >>up in core PCI code.
> >>
> >>For the aforementioned reasons, this patch introduces a dummy
> >>acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() hook in preparation for per-arch implementation
> >>of the same to retrieve the domain number on a per-arch basis when
> >>the system boots through ACPI.
> >>
> >>For the sake of code clarity the current code implementing generic
> >>domain number assignment (ie pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(), selected by
> >>CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC) is reshuffled so that the code implementing
> >>the DT domain assignment function is stubbed out into a corresponding
> >>helper, so that DT and ACPI functions are clearly separated in
> >>preparation for arches acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() implementations.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++--
> >> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >>index eb431b5..2b52178 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >>@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >> * Copyright 1997 -- 2000 Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>
> >> */
> >>
> >>+#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> #include <linux/delay.h>
> >> #include <linux/init.h>
> >>@@ -4941,7 +4942,7 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
> >> }
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
> >>-void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
> >>+static int of_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
> >
> >Can we do a little cleanup before this patch?
> >
> > - pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() is only used inside drivers/pci, so
> > maybe we move the prototype to drivers/pci/pci.h?
>
> pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() goes with pci_domain_nr() as an option
> for CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC. pci_domain_nr() is used commonly
> outside drivers/pci so we would need to split these calls then, thus
> personally I think it would be better to keep both in
> inclue/linux/pci.h
OK.
> > - I don't really like the style of calling a function that
> > internally assigns bus->domain_nr. Could we do something like
> > this instead?
> >
> > int pci_bus_domain_nr(...)
> > {
> > ...
> > return domain;
> > }
> >
> > ... pci_create_root_bus(...)
> > {
> > ...
> > b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
>
>
> We can. I do not see much difference between pci_bus_domain_nr() and
> pci_domain_nr() which we already have so how about calling it
> pci_bus_find_domain_nr instead? Lorenzo, any strong preference for
> it?
I suggested that to make them all parallel:
pci_bus_domain_nr()
of_pci_bus_domain_nr()
acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr()
If you want to make them all *pci_bus_find_domain_nr() that would be
OK with me, but I think it is worth keeping them the same except for
the prefix (none/"of_"/"acpi_"). I think that's what you suggested
below.
> >That would be two new patches, if this makes sense.
> >
> >And this patch would only rename pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() to
> >of_pci_bus_domain_nr() and add the pci_bus_domain_nr() wrapper.
>
> Giving that we would keep prototypes in inclue/linux/pci.h
>
> 1. First patch would rename pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() to
> pci_bus_find_domain_nr() and it would return domain number so that
> we could do:
> ... pci_create_root_bus(...)
> {
> ...
> b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
> ...
> }
>
> 2. Second patch would transform pci_bus_find_domain_nr() to be the
> wrapper for of_pci_bus_domain_nr()
>
> 3. Third patch would add stub definition, the ARM64 definition and
> the new call acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() in pci_bus_find_domain_nr()
> wrapper.
>
> Does this plan sound reasonable?
Sounds perfect!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
