Re: [PATCH V5 5/7] irqchip, gicv3, its: Probe ITS in the ACPI way.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.06.2016 13:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:19:42 +0200
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ITS is prepared for being initialized different than DT,
therefore we can initialize it in ACPI way. We collect register base
address from MADT table and pass mandatory info to firmware-agnostic
ITS init call.

Note that we are using here IORT lib to register ITS domain which
then can be found and used on to build another PCI MSI domain
in hierarchical stack domain.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

  }

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+
+#define ACPI_GICV3_ITS_MEM_SIZE (2 * SZ_64K)

SZ_128k?

+
+static int __init gic_acpi_parse_madt_its(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
+					  const unsigned long end)
+{
+	struct acpi_madt_generic_translator *its_entry;
+	struct fwnode_handle *dom_handle;
+	struct resource res;
+	int err;
+
+	its_entry = (struct acpi_madt_generic_translator *)header;
+	res.start = its_entry->base_address;
+	res.end = its_entry->base_address + ACPI_GICV3_ITS_MEM_SIZE - 1;
+
+	dom_handle = irq_domain_alloc_fwnode((void *)its_entry->base_address);
+	if (!dom_handle) {
+		pr_err("ITS@%pa: Unable to allocate GICv3 ITS domain token\n",
+		       &res.start);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	err = iort_register_domain_token(its_entry->translation_id, dom_handle);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("ITS@%pa: Unable to register GICv3 ITS domain token (ITS ID %d) to IORT\n",
+		       &res.start, its_entry->translation_id);
+		goto dom_err;
+	}
+
+	err = its_probe_one(&res, dom_handle);
+	if (!err)
+		return 0;
+
+	iort_deregister_domain_token(its_entry->translation_id);
+dom_err:
+	irq_domain_free_fwnode(dom_handle);
+	return err;
+}
+
+void __init its_acpi_probe(void)

Should be static.

+{
+	if (acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_TRANSLATOR,
+				  gic_acpi_parse_madt_its, 0) <= 0)
+		pr_info("No valid GIC ITS entries exist\n");

We already have a message further down, no need to shout twice.

+}
+#else
+static inline void __init its_acpi_probe(struct irq_domain *parent_domain) { }

Drop the inline, the compiler can figure out that by itself.


I will address all above comments in next series.

Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux