RE: [PATCH] ACPICA / hardware: Fix address check in acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Boris

Can you help to confirm if this can fix all of the issues you saw in the older qemu.

Thanks and best regards
-Lv

> From: Zheng, Lv
> Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA / hardware: Fix address check in
> acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width()
> 
> The address check in acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width() should be byte size
> based, not bit width based. This patch fixes this mistake.
> 
> Reported-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
> index 0f18dbc..74a591b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width(struct
> acpi_generic_address *reg, u8 max_bit_width)
>  		if (!reg->bit_offset && reg->bit_width &&
>  		    ACPI_IS_POWER_OF_TWO(reg->bit_width) &&
>  		    ACPI_IS_ALIGNED(reg->bit_width, 8) &&
> -		    ACPI_IS_ALIGNED(address, reg->bit_width)) {
> +		    ACPI_IS_ALIGNED(address, reg->bit_width >> 3)) {
>  			return (reg->bit_width);
>  		} else {
>  			if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO)
> {
> --
> 1.7.10

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux