On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Hi Ard, Jon Hi Gabriele :) > In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP > that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space. Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already. > A possible ACPI table solution was discussed already in this thread > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/14/722 > > where <<Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource>> > is used to specify an Host Controller specific resource. > It looks to me that this can be an approach that can accommodate > different vendors/scenarios and Bjorn seemed to be quite ok with > it. Yeah, pondering that. We'll chat with a few others about it. > It comes without saying that for future HW releases we all should > make an effort to deliver fully ECAM compliant controllers. Right. Like I said, a number of designs have been fixed already. > What's your view about this approach? Will followup over the weekend. Jon. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
