On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jayachandran C <jchandra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:30:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi >>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:37:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [cut] > > If we are moving the ACPI/PCI code from drivers/acpi to > arch/arm64/ , there is an issue in having the header file > ecam.h in drivers/pci > > The current include of "../pci/ecam.h" is slightly ugly (Arnd > and David had already noted this), but including the driver > header from arch code would be even worse. > > I can either merge ecam.h into include/linux/pci.h > or move it to a new file include/linux/pci-ecam.h, any > suggestion on which is preferable? My preference would be pci-ecam.h as we did a similar thing for pci-dma.h, for example, but basically this is up to Bjorn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
