On 2016/5/12 8:06, David Daney wrote:
On 05/11/2016 03:39 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:07:15AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
+static int __init get_mpidr_in_madt(int acpi_id, u64 *mpidr)
+{
+ unsigned long madt_end, entry;
+ struct acpi_table_madt *madt;
+ acpi_size tbl_size;
+
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_table_with_size(ACPI_SIG_MADT, 0,
+ (struct acpi_table_header **)&madt, &tbl_size)))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ entry = (unsigned long)madt;
+ madt_end = entry + madt->header.length;
+
+ /* Parse all entries looking for a match. */
+ entry += sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt);
+ while (entry + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < madt_end) {
+ struct acpi_subtable_header *header =
+ (struct acpi_subtable_header *)entry;
+
+ if (header->type == ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT) {
+ struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc =
+ container_of(header,
+ struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, header);
+
+ if ((gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) &&
+ (gicc->uid == acpi_id)) {
+ *mpidr = gicc->arm_mpidr;
+ early_acpi_os_unmap_memory(madt, tbl_size);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+ entry += header->length;
+ }
+
+ early_acpi_os_unmap_memory(madt, tbl_size);
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> ACPI processor UID mapping */
+void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct
acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
+{
+ int pxm, node;
+ u64 mpidr;
+
+ if (srat_disabled())
+ return;
+
+ if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity)) {
+ pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n",
+ pa->header.length);
+ bad_srat();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED))
+ return;
+
+ if (cpus_in_srat >= NR_CPUS) {
+ pr_warn_once("SRAT: cpu_to_node_map[%d] is too small, may
not be able to use all cpus\n",
+ NR_CPUS);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
+ node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
+
+ if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
+ bad_srat();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (get_mpidr_in_madt(pa->acpi_processor_uid, &mpidr)) {
+ pr_err("SRAT: PXM %d with ACPI ID %d has no valid MPIDR in
MADT\n",
+ pxm, pa->acpi_processor_uid);
+ bad_srat();
+ return;
+ }
I wonder whether you could replace the get_mpidr_in_madt() function with
something like acpi_get_phys_id(). It looks like get_mpidr_in_madt()
duplicates functionality already available elsewhere.
I just tried that, and it doesn't work.
The problem is that this code is being run very early in the boot, and
kmalloc cannot be used. acpi_get_phys_id() and its ilk can only be used
once we have working kmalloc. We need to extract the NUMA information
early like this precisely because it is needed to initializing the slab
system
Notice that we are using early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() et al. in
get_mpidr_in_madt() explicitly for this reason.
I got the same conclusion when I was preparing this patch set.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
