On Friday 06 May 2016 21:00:25 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On May 5, 2016 1:27 AM, "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday 29 April 2016 17:56:14 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Andy Lutomirski > > > <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Pali Rohár > > > > <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > >> On Friday 29 April 2016 20:10:23 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > >>> Jean and Wolfram: is there a quirk mechanism to add i2c > > > >>> devices that aren't directly enumerable but are known to > > > >>> exist due to DMI? > > > >> > > > >> Maybe something like i2c_register_board_info()? > > > > > > > > Maybe. i think that wants to be called before the adapter > > > > shows up, > > though. > > > > i2c_probe_optional_slaves may be a more appropriate place to put > > > this. > > > > I cannot find function i2c_probe_optional_slaves. Where is it? > > Sorry, I meant i801_probe_optional_slaves. Hm... that could probably work. I will look at dell-smo8800.c and lis3lv02d_i2c.c and i2c-i801.c how to interconnect all those devices... -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.