On Thursday 28 April 2016 17:34:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 28 April 2016 10:12:12 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Right, we don't have a good mechanism for passing more info into > > pci_create_root_bus(). Maybe the caller could fill in a struct so we > > have a chance to extend it without having to change all the existing > > callers. > > > > I wonder if there's a design pattern we can copy, e.g., would > > something like the scsi_host_alloc(), scsi_add_host(), > > scsi_scan_host() model work here? > > Yes, I think that is a good idea in general. Especially > now that we have separate the ARM code from pci_common_init_dev > and pci_sys_data, that can help with cleanups in the other drivers > as well. > > I see two common variations in other subsystems: some use a > special alloc() function that you pass the size of the private > data into, while others just expect you to embed a structure > inside of the driver specific one allocate that separately to > have the generic registration function fill out the common fields. > > I have a slight preference for the second, but they are really > the same thing basically. I've tried this out now, and will follow up with a separate patch series. Overall, I think it works out well, though I haven't gotten to the point of actually saving code yet. I've converted two drivers for demonstration. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
