On 27.04.2016 04:34, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:06:38PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:x86 and ia64 are the only arches that implement pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks and implement them in the same way. Moreover ARM64 is going to do the same. So it seems that acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus is generic enough to be default option for pcibios_{add|remove}_bus hooks. Also, it is always safe to run acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus as they have empty stubs for !ACPI case and return if ACPI has been switched off in run time. After all we can remove x86 and ia64 pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@xxxxxxx> Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/ia64/pci/pci.c | 10 ---------- arch/x86/pci/common.c | 10 ---------- drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c index 978d6af..be4c9ef 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c +++ b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c @@ -358,16 +358,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b) platform_pci_fixup_bus(b); } -void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); -} - -void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); -} - void pcibios_set_master (struct pci_dev *dev) { /* No special bus mastering setup handling */ diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c index 381a43c..7763a84 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c @@ -170,16 +170,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b) pcibios_fixup_device_resources(dev); } -void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); -} - -void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); -} - /* * Only use DMI information to set this if nothing was passed * on the kernel command line (which was parsed earlier). diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 8087297..ef569e8 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> #include <linux/aer.h> #include <linux/acpi.h> @@ -2101,10 +2102,12 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); } void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); }Is this buying us something more than just getting rid of these pcibios functions in the arches? The arch-specific pcibios methods by themselves don't seem too onerous, and I don't really want to add #includes and calls to every firmware interface under the sun. I admit it's a net removal of 17 lines, but I'm not sure it's a net reduction in complexity for the reader, who now has to remember that this ACPI stuff is a no-op on most arches. As a tangent, some of the stuff in acpi_pci_add_bus() really belongs elsewhere anyway. For example, the _DSM stuff should probably be in acpi_pci_root_create() since it's a one-per-host bridge kind of thing.
OK, I will add pcibios_add_bus to ARM64 arch code and call acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus) from there.
Thanks, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
