On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:05:39AM +0000, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, Greg > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA / Interpreter: Fix a regression triggered because > > of wrong Linux ECDT support > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:39:56AM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote: > > > 4.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objects, please let me know. > > > > Huh? I don't understand this email... > > > > > [Lv Zheng] > > I received an error notice from you on 4/11/2016: > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPICA / Interpreter: Fix a regression triggered because of ACPICA: Events: Enhance acpi_ev_execute_reg_method() to" failed to apply to 4.5-stable tree > And promised you to perform the back porting. > After having it tested by LKP for several days, I sent it out to the stable mailing list. > > I'm sorry I didn't send this email to you directly and didn't send it to the original mail thread for you to reference. > The original thread is: > Message-ID: <14603111697259@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPICA / Interpreter: Fix a regression triggered because of > ACPICA: Events: Enhance acpi_ev_execute_reg_method() to" failed to apply to 4.5-stable tree > > Hope you can help to have this shipped in 4.5-stable. Yes, it's in my "to apply" queue, which is still not empty. Don't worry, it's not lost :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
