On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
Hi Andy and thanks for the review!
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch adds supports for I2C device enumeration and removal via
> > ACPI reconfiguration notifications that are send as a result of an
> > ACPI table load or unload operation.
>
> >
> > acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> >
> > + strlcpy(info->type, dev_name(&adev->dev), sizeof(info->type));
>
> strscpy() ?
That is the original code, I just moved it in a different function.
Its probably best if we use a separate patch for this, but is it worth
it?
>
> > +static int acpi_i2c_match_adapter(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_adapter *adapter = i2c_verify_adapter(dev);
> > +
> > + if (!adapter)
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> > + return ACPI_HANDLE(dev) == (acpi_handle)data;
>
> What is suppose to return? Hidden bool to integer conversion is not
> best option I suppose.
>
per bus_find_device() :
* The callback should return 0 if the device doesn't match and
non-zero
* if it does. If the callback returns non-zero, this function will
* return to the caller and not iterate over any more devices.
*/
struct device *bus_find_device(struct bus_type *bus,
struct device *start, void *data,
int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data))
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int acpi_i2c_match_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + return ACPI_COMPANION(dev) == data;
>
> Ditto.
>
> > +}
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
