RE: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to tables.c

["Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to
> tables.c
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi, Rafael
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >> From: Zheng, Lv
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / tables: Move table override mechanisms to
> >> tables.c
> >>
> >> This patch moves acpi_os_table_override() and
> >> acpi_os_physical_table_override() to tables.c.
> >>
> 
> [cut]
> 
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE
> >> -void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size);
> >> +void early_acpi_table_init(void *data, size_t size);
> >>  #else
> >> -static inline void acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
> >> +static inline void early_acpi_table_init(void *data, size_t size)
> >>  {
> >>  }
> >>  #endif
> > [Lv Zheng]
> > This block was wrong.
> > early_acpi_table_init() is no longer dependent on
> CONFIG_ACPI_INITRD_TABLE_OVERRIDE but dependent on CONFIG_ACPI.
> 
> I see.
> 
> > Updated v2 patches are sent to the mailing list.
> 
> Is this the only difference between v1 and v2?

[Lv Zheng] 
One of the follow-up patches (PATCH 3) in this series is updated accordingly.

Thanks and best regards
-Lv
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f