I noticed that too. Thanks for letting me know it's happening. I'll give it another shot on v2 -----Original Message----- From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:25 AM To: Derrick, Jonathan <jonathan.derrick@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Busch, Keith <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixups for mixed pcie_ports=auto and native On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:01:18AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote: > This set introduces a fixup that lets non-acpi pcie ports subscribe to > native port services. The theory is that on an acpi system, native > services will require acpi to release control of the port instance. > > Rather than failing on non-acpi devices, we should continue as if they > were native to begin with, and try to subscribe to native services > just the same. > > Jon Derrick (2): > PCI/ACPI: Do not fail ports without ACPI entries > PCI/PCIe: Fixups for acpi port setup not being allowed to fail I don't know what happened, but I don't see the first patch either in patchwork (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/), the linux-pci archives, or my own email. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
