On 30-03-16, 03:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -843,6 +883,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
>
> if (data) {
> + policy->fast_switch_possible = false;
Is this done just for keeping code symmetric or is there a logical advantage
of this? Just for my understanding, not saying that it is wrong.
Otherwise, it looks good
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
