On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, March 28, 2016 02:33:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 22-03-16, 02:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[cut]
>> > +static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
>> > + unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
>> > +{
>> > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
>> > + unsigned int max_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>> > + u64 last_freq_update_time = sg_policy->last_freq_update_time;
>> > + unsigned int j;
>> > +
>> > + if (util == ULONG_MAX)
>> > + return max_f;
>> > +
>> > + for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
>> > + struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu;
>> > + unsigned long j_util, j_max;
>> > + u64 delta_ns;
>> > +
>> > + if (j == smp_processor_id())
>> > + continue;
>>
>> Why skip local CPU completely ?
>
> Because the original util and max come from it.
>
>> And if we really want to do that, what about something like for_each_cpu_and_not
>> to kill the unnecessary if {} statement ?
>
> That will work.
Except that for_each_cpu_and_not is not defined as of today.
I guess I can play with cpumasks, but then I'm not sure that will end
up actually more efficient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
