On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/23/2016 6:22 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >> I had a look at your patchset and also in your git repo at the other >> patches that you ported over from Tomasz; it seems that now we miss >> a quirk mechanism to enable controller that are not fully ECAM. >> >> This was provided before by Tomasz in: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/16/410 >> >> I think we should put something like that back in... Like Tomasz mentioned in his mail, his approach does not work for raw operations. I have added raw operations in may patchset, so we have to come up with a new approach or decide that raw operations can be dropped. I am waiting for the overall acceptance of the patch set before going further along this path >> >> Thanks >> >> Gab > > I was requested to test your patchset. I'll need this mechanism before > I can start. Please see above, we will need to look at the quirks again. > Sinan JC. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
