On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Prashanth Prakash
<pprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ACPI_SYSTEM_HID is defined in drivers/acpi/bus.c out-of-band.
>
> Move the definition to include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h, together
> with other Linux specific HIDs, so that it can be used by other
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
> include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 407a376..358e3c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/nls.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>
> +#include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
> +
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
> @@ -22,7 +24,6 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("scan");
> extern struct acpi_device *acpi_root;
>
> #define ACPI_BUS_CLASS "system_bus"
> -#define ACPI_BUS_HID "LNXSYBUS"
No.
This is not a valid device ID and should never be used as such.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
