On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:32:04AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 03/10/2016 01:34 PM, Xiangliang Yu wrote: > >Add device HID AMDI0010 to match the AMD ACPI Vendor ID (AMDI) that > >was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C > >controller on future AMD paltform will use the HID instead of AMD0010. > > > >Signed-off-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@xxxxxxx> > >--- > > drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 1 + > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c > >index d507cf6..d0aad06 100644 > >--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c > >+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c > >@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = { > > /* Generic apd devices */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE > > { "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) }, > >+ { "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) }, > > { "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) }, > > { "AMD0030", }, > > #endif > >diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > >index 438f1b4..d656657 100644 > >--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > >+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c > >@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = { > > { "80860F41", 0 }, > > { "808622C1", 0 }, > > { "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK }, > >+ { "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK }, > > { "AMDI0510", 0 }, > > { "APMC0D0F", 0 }, > > { } > >-- > I guess these changes don't necessarily need to go together? Although I > think chances to get a conflict is pretty low. I would have preferred seperate patches, too. > For i2c-designware: > Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> For the record: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
