You're right, it's not evaluating the OSDW method properly. I tracked
it down to this single change:
change this:
If (!OSDW ())
{
Return (UBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.SPI1.SPIT._CRS.UBUF */
}
Return (ABUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.SPI1.SPIT._CRS.ABUF */
}
to:
Return (UBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.SPI1.SPIT._CRS.UBUF */
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:13:16AM +0100, Leif Liddy wrote:
>> I'll post more tomorrow, need to evaluate the changes I made --but I
>> think the change that did it was changing this:
>>
>> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
>> {
>> If (!OSDW ())
>> {
>> Return (WBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.SPI1.WBUF */
>> }
>>
>> Return (ConcatenateResTemplate (RBUF, DBUF))
>> }
>>
>> to:
>>
>> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
>> {
>> Return (ConcatenateResTemplate (RBUF, DBUF))
>> }
>
> If that is true then the fix is to change the OS we're reporting to ACPI:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/acpi/osl.c#n141
>
> We had trouble with this before:
> https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/29954.html
>
> I've just grabbed the acpidump you've posted here:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=200961&action=edit
>
> I'll take a look at it hopefully this afternoon to see what they've
> changed in the OSDW method.
>
> Thanks a lot for your perseverance in tackling this issue.
>
> Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
