Hi Bob, On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 05:39:14 PM Moore, Robert wrote: > > > There are few things I see missing in this patch in your updates made to > > actbl1.h, I list them below: > > > > 1) Adding time stamp as you did breaks backwards compatibility (something > > we discovered during our testing). We tried to remedy this by adding a > > new version of the acpi_hest_generic_data structure. Note that we named > > it v3 to reflect this was the updated version number in ACPI 6.1. (see > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/5/549) > > I used V300 in case there is ever some other 3xx version. > > Plus, I made a full struct for the V300 case. > > > > > 2) Missing definition of generic error data validation bits, needed to > > determine whether or not field being read are valid or not (see > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/5/549) > > Done. > > > > > 3) Need to extend acpi_hest_notify_types to add GPIO, SEA, SEI, and GSIV > > (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/5/545) > > Done. OK Should I expect an update of the $subject patch, then, or will there be a new patch on top of it? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
