On Wed, 17 Feb, at 02:17:28PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Instead of opencoding let's use generic UUID library functions here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/efivarfs/inode.c | 40 +++-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/efivarfs/inode.c b/fs/efivarfs/inode.c
> index 3381b9d..b579e3a 100644
> --- a/fs/efivarfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/efivarfs/inode.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> @@ -44,11 +45,7 @@ struct inode *efivarfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> */
> bool efivarfs_valid_name(const char *str, int len)
> {
> - static const char dashes[EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN] = {
> - [8] = 1, [13] = 1, [18] = 1, [23] = 1
> - };
> const char *s = str + len - EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN;
> - int i;
>
> /*
> * We need a GUID, plus at least one letter for the variable name,
> @@ -66,37 +63,7 @@ bool efivarfs_valid_name(const char *str, int len)
> *
> * 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN; i++) {
> - if (dashes[i]) {
> - if (*s++ != '-')
> - return false;
> - } else {
> - if (!isxdigit(*s++))
> - return false;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static void efivarfs_hex_to_guid(const char *str, efi_guid_t *guid)
> -{
> - guid->b[0] = hex_to_bin(str[6]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[7]);
> - guid->b[1] = hex_to_bin(str[4]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[5]);
> - guid->b[2] = hex_to_bin(str[2]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[3]);
> - guid->b[3] = hex_to_bin(str[0]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[1]);
> - guid->b[4] = hex_to_bin(str[11]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[12]);
> - guid->b[5] = hex_to_bin(str[9]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[10]);
> - guid->b[6] = hex_to_bin(str[16]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[17]);
> - guid->b[7] = hex_to_bin(str[14]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[15]);
> - guid->b[8] = hex_to_bin(str[19]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[20]);
> - guid->b[9] = hex_to_bin(str[21]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[22]);
> - guid->b[10] = hex_to_bin(str[24]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[25]);
> - guid->b[11] = hex_to_bin(str[26]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[27]);
> - guid->b[12] = hex_to_bin(str[28]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[29]);
> - guid->b[13] = hex_to_bin(str[30]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[31]);
> - guid->b[14] = hex_to_bin(str[32]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[33]);
> - guid->b[15] = hex_to_bin(str[34]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[35]);
> + return uuid_is_valid(s);
> }
I think you've confused yourself here. You've inverted the return
value meaning for efivarfs_valid_name().
Normally I would expect this change to be correct but uuid_is_valid()
returns 0 for success, -EINVAL for failure. Either the function is
misnamed or the return value semantics are wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
