On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 05:12:18 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> <aleksey.makarov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Factor out the code that finds the first physical device
> > of a given ACPI device. It is used in several places.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hmm… Sorry, didn't notice one style issue and there is one is matter
> of taste below.
>
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id forbidden_id_list[] = {
>
> > + pdevinfo.parent = adev->parent ?
> > + acpi_get_first_physical_node(adev->parent) : NULL;
>
> Matter of taste, but I believe if-else looks better here even when
> consumes +2 LOC.
I disagree.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
