On Friday, February 05, 2016 09:47:40 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 02:05:37PM +0530, Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair wrote: > > [...] > > > pci_host_acpi.c is a generic implementation of these using a sysdata > > pointing to acpi_pci_root_info, and using a pointer to the pci_mmcfg_region > > to access ECAM area, Maybe I can rename this file to > > pci_acpi_host_generic.c to reflect this better. > > Maybe you should stop sending this series and work with Tomasz to > get this done, you are confusing everyone and I am really really > annoyed about this. > > Do you realize there is no point in having two patch series doing > the same thing and wasting everyone's review time ? > > Do you realize he started this work long before you and went through > several rounds of review already (I told you before but in case you > forgot) ? > > Tomasz posted a version yesterday, integrating comments following months > of review and testing and I think it is ready to get upstream: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/4/646 > > Did you even consider reviewing his code or helping him instead of > churning out more patches doing the *SAME* thing ? > > Do you want all of us to go through your code and re-fix what has > already been fixed in Tomasz's series with the end result of missing > yet another merge window ? > > This is really annoying, stop it please, really. OK, so to be crystal clear here. I'm going to ignore the series the $subject patch belongs to going forward. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
