On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:30:12PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
> >How about the following (similar to x86)?
> >
> >----
> > if (!numa_off) {
> >#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > if (!numa_init(acpi_numa_init))
> > return 0;
> >#endif
> >#ifdef CONFIG_OF_NUMA
> > if (!numa_init(of_numa_init))
> > return 0;
> >#endif
> > }
> >
> > return numa_init(dummy_numa_init);
> >----
> >
> >Pretty straight and nice.
> >
> >Note: The !acpi_disabled check needs to be moved to the beginning of
> >acpi_numa_init(). Variable ret can be removed.
>
> Lorenzo suggested to remove it, Lorenzo, what's your opinion here?
I do not think it is a big deal. OF is not a fall-back for ACPI,
which is what the code above may make us think, either you parse
ACPI or you parse DT.
I will have a look at the complete code to check if we can rewrite
it differently but I would not be too worried about it.
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
