On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Adds a function that sets the pointer to dev_pm_domain in struct device
>> and that warns if the device has already finished probing. The reason
>> why we want to enforce that is because in the general case that can
>> cause problems and also that we can simplify code quite a bit if we can
>> always assume that.
>>
>> This patch also changes all current code that directly sets the
>> dev.pm_domain pointer.
>
>
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
>
>> @@ -875,13 +876,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>
>> switch (action) {
>> case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
>> - pdev->dev.pm_domain = &acpi_lpss_pm_domain;
>> + dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, &acpi_lpss_pm_domain);
>> break;
>> case BUS_NOTIFY_DRIVER_NOT_BOUND:
>> case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
>> pdev->dev.pm_domain = NULL;
>
> Missed?
>
>> break;
>> case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
>> + dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, &acpi_lpss_pm_domain);
>> if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_LTR)
>> return sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
>> &lpss_attr_group);
>> @@ -889,6 +891,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
>> if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_LTR)
>> sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &lpss_attr_group);
>> + dev_pm_domain_set(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> break;
>> default:
>> break;
>
> This looks wrong. I didn't test yet, but I have concerns here. Why did
> you add those calls?
Okay, for first glance it seems working on Intel Braswell. But can
yoyu point me out what was going on before this patch?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
