GIC version inconsistency in ACPI 5.1a versus 6.0 documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Everyone:

I have been asked to post here on behalf of the UEFI Forum's ACPI Spec Work
Group (ASWG) to provide some clarification regarding the ACPI Specification
versions 5.1a and 6.0.  For those who may not know me, I am the Chair of
this work group.

In particular it turns out that there are different definitions contained in
the these two versions of the document for the GIC version field contained
in the GIC Distributor Structure.  This structure is located in Table 5-63
in both versions of the document.  I am told this inconsistency is causing
some problems for implementation work.

The inconsistency arises purely from an administrative error on our part as
keepers of the ACPI Specification.  I want to apologize to anyone who has
been inconvenienced by this issue.

The sharp-eyed may notice that the dates on the covers of the two versions
are the same.  The Forum's normal practice when making a new revision is to
re-publish the prior version with all known errata included so that the
content that is common between the existing and new documents matches.  This
accounts for the two documents having the same date; in fact they were
published on the exact same day at the same time.

In the case of this one particular structure definition, as shown in Table
5-63, the content was corrected to match what it should say in the 6.0
version of the document.  Unfortunately we messed up and the same fix was
not properly retrofitted to the ACPI 5.1 spec to be included with the 5.1a
(latest errata included version of 5.1 that was released at the same time as
6.0).

Now this inconsistency has been pointed out, the UEFI Forum will publish a
revised version 5.1b that will incorporate a fix for this problem.  This
will however take a little time to organize so it may be some days before
that updated document appears on the Forum's public web site.

Since it was felt that this issue is causing friction for implementation
work going on right now, the Work Group asked that I post the above
explanation and mitigation as well as the following recommendation to help
move implementation work ahead without delay.

The recommendation from the UEFI Forum in this case then is:

- For implementation purposes, the definition in the ACPI 5.1a for the GIC
version field that is part of the GIC Distributor Structure (Table 5-63) is
incorrect and instead implementers should refer to the corresponding
sections of the ACPI 6.0 Specification (the Table to refer to is numbered
the same in both documents).  The inconsistency will be corrected shortly
with the release of a revised ACPI Spec 5.1b update.

For the avoidance of doubt, this means that implementers seeking to conform
to the ACPI 5.1 specification should implement to the ACPI 5.1a in every
particular except for the above referenced GIC version field which should
follow the definition contained in the ACPI 6.0 version of the
specification.  This advice holds true until a revised ACPI 5.1b is
published at which time there will be no inconsistency.

My hope is that the above will clarify and help implementation work progress
without any further delay.  If I can answer extra questions to help in that
regard, please let me know.
--
Cheers,
 
Mark.
--
Mark Doran
President & AWG Chair, UEFI Forum
Intel Fellow


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux