On 07/11/15 00:51, Loc Ho wrote: > The function acpi_gsi_to_irq should returns 0 on success as upper function > caller expect an 0 for sucesss. I have to ask: why do you feel the need to change an API that behaves like the rest of the IRQ allocation functions (at least when it comes to its return value)? 0 is defined as an invalid interrupt, and I wish it stayed that way. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
