Hello,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:20:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> +static void __init init_memory_less_node(int nid)
> {
> + unsigned long zones_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0};
> + unsigned long zholes_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0};
It doesn't cause any functional difference but it's a bit weird to use
{0} because it explicitly says to initialize the first element to 0
when the whole array needs to be cleared. Wouldnt { } make more sense?
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index e23a9e7..9c4d4d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ static inline bool is_dev_zone(const struct zone *zone)
>
> extern struct mutex zonelists_mutex;
> void build_all_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct zone *zone);
> +void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat);
This isn't used in this patch. Contamination?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
