Hi Andy, thanks for your review, > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 1:00 AM > To: Zheng, Lv > Cc: Chen, Yu C; Moore, Robert; Wysocki, Rafael J; Brown, Len; Andy > Lutomirski; Lv Zheng; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux ACPI; H. Peter > Anvin; Borislav Petkov > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] ACPI / x86: introduce acpi_os_readable() support > [cut] > > I think that hpa or Borislav [cc'd] could address the memory map details > better than I could. However, this functionality seems strange. > > Are these physical addresses or virtual addresses that are being dumped? [Yu] They are virtual addresses to be dumped. > In either case, ISTM that using something iike page_is_ram might be a lot > simpler. [Yu] if i understand correctly, this API is used to check if the address is a valid 'kmalloc' style address, but not 'kmap' or 'vmalloc' address, and page_is_ram might treat the latter as valid address? thanks, Yu ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
